From Orthodoxy to the phenomenon NUCLEAR ENERGY: FRAGMENTS OF BORROWING METHODOLOGY ANTROPOSOTSIALNOGO INTERPRETATION

UDC 230.1+621.039.009

FOREWORD

Нельзя сказать, that the humanities, philosophy, theology, Literature and Art XX-XXI centuries left ambivalent phenomenon of nuclear energy (basic concepts – http://narfu.ru/aan/archive/AaN_2012_5.pdf), as an important part of being, unattended (см., например, three of my articles at http://e-conf.nkras.ru/konferencii/econf/filos.html), тем более, in the context of globalization and informatization. But this is clearly not enough attention. И, perhaps, lack of examples, individual and collective, "Highest order" a talent "artists". No decent methodological framework and completeness watching.

This database can be configured through the basic analogues, to be selected. Promises to be useful soosmyslenie sociocultural phenomena of nuclear energy and religion. Прежде всего – approach through postulates and theological achievement of Christianity and Orthodoxy. We denote the background and only the contours of such an approach. We will not address issues of faith in God. Similarly, to some extent,, Training course "Fundamentals of Orthodox Culture". This is a private matter. We will not be submitted exclusively supporters ritual and consumer, dogmatically, sanctimonious, Rants and demonstration, superficial religiosity, as a sign of degradation swept Russia. Rightly said (Onions., 18, 8): “But the Son of Man, coming, find faith on the earth?”. Will still napravlyaemy this analogue, but only the depth and specificity of the methodology of Orthodoxy, in the context of interface phenomena, basic question: "Why?”, "Why?"And" how?”

Of particular importance is the proposed approach for Siberia. The whole world knows, that it is in Russian Siberia are unique (and the world's largest) nuclear military-industrial complex: Siberian Chemical Plant (near Tomsk) Krasnoyarsk Mining and Chemical Combine. That's what the world owes to those mills, that there was a third world war - nuclear. These factories material provided nuclear deterrence (a set of international norms and rules of real life difficult), in whose favor the specific historical conditions now challenged only politicking talkers, но не серьезные историки. В одном из первых документов, подписанных И. Stalin within the Soviet atomic project deployment, namely in Tomsk, at the Tomsk Polytechnic Institute, was ordered to train personnel for the nuclear industry throughout the country. Is Krasnokamensk, which is explicitly stated in Article, it is out of Siberia? Tobol, Irtysh, Ob, Yenisei - all these rivers have received the imprint of the nuclear industry. Not to explore whether these effects and created a structural unit of the RAS in Tobolsk? Norilsk and neftegaz Kara Sea shelf (and east) can not work without nuclear icebreakers. Underground nuclear explosions produced in some Siberian regions. There are many more such facts. It's all history. А как дальше быть с наличием и дальнейшим развитием ядерной индустрии Сибири? Раньше никто никого об этом не спрашивал. Строили – и все. Так надо было. Теперь, under the new conditions and taking into account the lived, possible and necessary to make decisions (and if necessary, arrange them legally) otherwise. И еще: fate a long time ago "showed" Siberia F. Dostoevsky, without reference to which it is impossible to comprehend antroposotsialnuyu nuclear subjects. And this article is.

Ecumenical and CIVILIZATIONAL RELATIONSHIP

In nuclear and religious phenomena have much in common in the basis and border topics. Nuclear Energy (as well as cosmological and geological processes) inherent elements of eternity compared to the life of humanity, as well as direct “contribution” in the reality of his existence. That in the sphere of social phenomena is somehow similar time parameters and significance for understanding the genesis and manifestations of human civilization as people? Course, прежде всего, religion, а также ее мировоззренческая составляющая. Христианство и Православие ориентируют человека на вечность, рассматривают ключевые, земные, проблемы в таком ракурсе. Они дают нормы, sometimes paradoxical, earthly (external and internal) people's lives - good and evil, to have a decent prospect of future.

Man belongs to two worlds – material and spiritual. С одной стороны, we – Children of energy and matter stars. We are composed of molecules, atoms and atomic nuclei, that is, nuclear power is not only, but also within us. In the literal and figurative senses. On the other, – “God – The lord's prayer”. Already begun the material world and the biological life, known, treat these two concepts. Recently found (the greatest scientific discovery of the last fifty years) boson Higgsa samimi fizikami spoken of as "chastitsey God". They are the same and "Trinity" - the name of the world's first test of nuclear weapons technology.

Страны христианской культуры первыми освоили ядерную энергию. Western Christian philosophers and theologians in the first nuclear world marked a new level of problems concerning the nature and future, as Christianity, and humanity (including legal - K. Jaspers) generally [1,2].

WHY?

According to Christianity and Orthodoxy, world is arranged so, that there is a heaven and hell. Humanity must choose between them. With full awareness of and, and other. Nuclear energy acts of people in the world can provide either one, or other. Knowledge of nuclear energy (antroposotsialnom in context) and encouraging its use have meaning only in unity with a deep understanding (as the basis for action in the nuclear field and their legal regulation) essence of man and society.

Orthodoxy leads to the idea, that our current, so-called "normal", abnormally deep substantially. Human potential is great, but you can not, man to "crude" manifested itself in full force. Godlike nature of man with huge potential deeply damaged. As a result, political, scientific and technical development of mankind in spite of initial good intentions led to the possibility of the collapse of Earth's civilization. В глобальном плане необходимо очеловечить человечество, победить внутреннее зло в человеке, чтобы не случались все новые и “совершенные” “Содомы” и “Гоморры”. And apologists of Orthodoxy (например, A professor and theologian. Osipov) prove it quite secular, scientifically, logical, the historical, on facts [3]. Add, that not all was well with the purity of the soul and Russian professionals and managers of nuclear matter. And also point to the considerable amount of direct and serious violations of ethical norms and national legislation (см., например, discussion on the agency website PRoAtom). And this – !?!?

Although Orthodoxy is no unambiguous, for all occasions “Nuclear” philosophical life “prescription”, it has a universal experience, which was formed thousands of years. This experience and the truth of Revelation (if any, to take in the fact) allow to draw a lot of them again and again. And this is a good basis in the coming soosmyslenii, together atheists and believers, nuclear phenomenon and mankind. Unproductive persist and block progress, focusing exclusively on the analysis of the truth or validity of religion. Целесообразно методологически учиться у мировоззрения, которое “во веки веков”. Поэтому в предстоящем соработничестве предпочтительны каноны и апологеты религии. Although no attention should not be abandoned, and the arguments of critics of religion, especially when they are motivated by a comprehensive discussion of the methodology.

We do not encourage or criticize religion primitive adapt to its canons. We are looking for spiritual and humanitarian reflection nuclear phenomenon worthy of intellectual perspectives and resources, base, position, concept, Principles, Approaches, norms. And then the rich experience of religion as a special kind of outlook and sustainable social phenomena can not be not to use. With thoroughness and accuracy, appeal to this phenomenon may, without prejudice to religious canons and without criticism from secular philosophers, humanities in general by occupation and humanists in spirit. Because Christianity, in the original sense, except for his revelation, - Then it is still a certain someone's brilliant "idea", Example path, which can provide positive change perishing world through human change.

Богословам в духовно-гуманитарном осмыслении феномена ядерной энергии и формировании приемлемого социоядерного будущего, думается, должна быть отведена важная роль. Especially Orthodox. Base - the rest, against the background of radical changes (distortions original essence) other branches of Christianity, orientation of Orthodoxy on the inner world of man, his spiritual self. Only Christianity still has a chance not only to get carried away and socialization omirscheniem, не отойти от первоначальной и главной задачи христианства – видеть глубинный корень всех бед и радостей, потерь и благ, земного и вечного, индивидуального и общечеловеческого бытия. The result - the desire to preserve the completeness of purification of the soul, man's inner world, create the basis for standards of earthly existence.

WHY IS POSSIBLE?

Apologists of Orthodoxy "go to the people" in science and technology. Now the Russian Orthodox Church is active not only in the traditional print and electronic media channels, но и в Интернет.

Патриарх Московский и всея Руси Алексий II писал: “Без упования на Господа… невозможен подлинный успех в области ядерной энергии” [4]. Science and religion are methodologically largely are not absolute antagonists. In the global problem of the possibility of knowledge of the universe (in the study of the microworld and the mega especially.) their views converge - can not adequately know. Science and religion are not only antagonistic, but also moral begin to converge.

Rev. D. Kir'yanov notes: “С момента возникновения во второй половине XX века междисциплинарной области исследований «наука и религия» сформировалось множество концептуальных подходов… соотнесения науки и религии”. Рассматривалась даже “программа «критического реализма» как моста между наукой и религией”, as well as – методологические параллели [5]. Достаточно известно к тому же, на большем уровне обобщения, Christianity, например, methodologically interacted and interacts with various non-Christian cultures.

Different religions have already spoken about nuclear weapons [6]. Adequate assessment of the religious "peaceful atom", видимо, ahead. Appeal to the achievements of thinkers religious philosophy, practical experience of the churches and religious media can give much. Russian Orthodox Church, например, considers, что “introduction” незыблемых духовных ценностей в научно-техническое творчество далеко выходит за национально-государственные рамки, directly about finding grounds for the construction of human civilization in the new millennium [7].

World Russian People's Council (VRNS) Hearings held in Sarov "Nuclear weapons and Russia's national security" and "Problems of interaction Russian Orthodox Church and the leading scientific centers of Russia". Metropolitan (then) Kirill said hearings “Nuclear weapons and ...” warning quoted the Bible: “Because, when they say,: "Peace and security", then sudden destruction cometh upon them” (1Fez, 5, 3). This idea is given in the original context of the theme of the Messiah, man's salvation, Studies Bojiyego, eschatological notions, permanent moral and spiritual wakefulness and work for people. Milestone in the process of convergence of approaches science and religion to know the world was the assignment in 2010 Patriarch Kirill honorary doctorate MEPhI, and in 2012. – MGU. During operation XVI ARNS (2012of) again repeatedly recalled the idea: "Orthodoxy has something to say to the world". In 2012. MEPHI (as in the Ural Mining University) theology department was opened. Its head was the head of the Department for External Church Relations of the Moscow Patriarchate, Metropolitan Hilarion (http://www.proatom.ru/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid = 4066).

For example Sarova, its multi-faceted service to the Fatherland, reveals the essence of many organic convergence of the Russian Orthodox Church and the Ministry of Atomic Energy, predetermined unique value of the Church and the nuclear field in the context of protection, спасения России – в прошлом, настоящем и будущем. “Физики без священников – современные папуасы”, – так видит ситуацию относительно ядерного центра в Сарове православный журнал “Фома” [8].

A professor and theologian. Osipov in 1991-99 years, was co-chair of the annual International Conference of the resonant "Science. Philosophy. Religion "at the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research. He successfully for over twenty years has lectured and debated in class nuclear physicists, Recalling the responsibility of scientists, in 2011. received an honorary award JINR Dubna for outstanding achievements in theology and long-term cooperation with this institution. He is the interpretation of the dogma of the Holy Trinity as a successful analogy repeatedly uses the concepts of "man" and "atom" [3].

POTENTIAL INTERFACE METHODOLOGY

To name just a few possible angles:

Space Art / Universe;

Trinity;

union with man;

universal humanity ("Jew and, Hellene and ... ");

save humanity from humanity;

"Spirit creates itself a form of";

"For our thoughts and ...";

belief in their cause, ideological firmness, patristic tradition.

MODERN FEATURES: Pragmatists "Points of Growth"

In Russia there are two nuclear-religious center – Sarov and Sergiev Posad. Suggested a third [9]. A fourth (S.-Petersburg) as such, it would be better not to visit. Considering in connection with nuclear energy various social institutions, abroad offered to ensure proper public attention to long (millions of years) the fate of radioactive waste to create a "nuclear College pastorate" [10]. It seems, что в российском варианте в рамках многогранной концепции SAMPO нечто подобное могло бы быть связано, прежде всего, с системой приграничных сочетаний, с не исключительно общественной, but the linking of state-religious territory lying between them, and finally - the whole country:

1)international nuclear underground storage within the geological structure of the Pechenga Pechenga plus Trifonov Monastery Murmansk and Monchegorsk diocese;

2)similar facility in Krasnokamensk plus young Krasnokamenskoye deanery and Chita Krasnokamensk diocese.

And much respect to this option will depend on the professionalism and moral qualities of Russian geologists, miners and nuclear, the success of the secular legal support and spiritual nourishment project by the Russian Orthodox Church, in partnership with other religious institutions.

The main question today is not nuclear energy technology, and psychological, said, summarizing held at the St. Petersburg Economic Forum - 2012 "Roundtable" "Nuclear Power: Year after Fukusimы ", With Rosatom CEO. Kirienko (http://www.proatom.ru/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid = 3854). Nuclear Energy in Russia die without public support, заявил журналистам первый заместитель гендиректора Росатома А. Локшин в кулуарах седьмого международного общественного форума-диалога “Атомная энергия, общество, безопасность – 2012” (http://www.ria.ru/atomtec_news/20120905/743554229.html). Говоря, скорее всего, о сиюминутных частностях, чиновники, не ведая того, что называется, “попали в яблочко”.

Осмысление ядерного феномена и укоренение в социуме ядерного техно в значимых для цивилизации, легитимных и безопасных масштабах, как и религии (по крайней мере – христианства), globally should not have a goal to destroy human, and save it. Nuclear example, examiner in the coordinates of the canons of Orthodoxy and in the context of the anthropic principle and sotsioyadernogo sociocultural paradigm (http://narfu.ru/aan/archive/AaN_2012_5.pdf; http://www.dialog21.ru/biblio/komleva.htm), would help establish a common mentality sotsioyadernoy, individual and State. Creation of civilized philosophical and socio-humanitarian grounds, legal norms wise development of other ambivalent about the whole humanity of Science and Technology, the number of which will only continue to multiply. Together, this may contribute to the consolidation of mankind in the face of global challenges, of threats to the destruction. Develop awareness of the general mechanism of ownership and responsibility for their own destiny of mankind. Also – evolution, involution and not spiritual and cultural nature of legal systems [11].

An earlier attempt to pose topics designated in my previous publications (http://noc.chgaki.ru /?page=conf; http://www.proatom.ru/modules.php?name=News&file=print&sid = 118; Religion and the phenomenon of nuclear energy: sociocultural interface circuits. Special award for an article on competition of scientific works "Responsibility of religion and science in the modern world", November 2005 of, Biblical Theological Institute of St. Andrew, Москва; http://helion-ltd.ru/komleva-sp-11-2008 /; http://helion-ltd.ru/philosophical-base/, http://www.voskres.ru/economics/komleva.htm; http://e-conf.nkras.ru/konferencii/econf/filos.html; http://www.lawinrussia.ru/node/164207; http://www.sciteclibrary.ru/rus/catalog/pages/10627.html и др.). It corresponds to the trends in the overall strengthening of the humanization and humanization of science and technology fields.

Thank you for supporting research and valuable comments of Professor BrigitteFalkenburg.

References

1. Jaspers, K. The atomic bomb and the Human Future: political awareness in our time. Munchen, 1958, 506 s.

2. Garrison, J. The Darkness of God: Theology after Hiroshima. London: SCM Press, 1982, 238 p.

3. Osipov, AI. Audio lectures

(http://www.aosipov.ru/audio/audio_obshchii_spisok_lektsij.html).

4. Hello, Patriarch of Moscow and All Russia Alexy II participants hearings "Nuclear weapons and national security of Russia" (http://pravsarov.nne.ru/content/publication/461/552/486/518.html).

5. Kir'yanov, DV. Science and religion: variety of methodological approaches // Proceedings of Tobolsk Theological Seminary, issue 2. - Tobolsk: Tobolsk Theological Seminary, 2011. – С. 117-134.

6. Ethics and weapons of mass destruction: religious and secular perspectives / edited by S.H. Hashmi and S.P. Lee. – Cambridge, 2004. – 533 p.

7. Report of Patriarch Alexy II at the Jubilee Bishops' Council of the Russian Orthodox Church, 2000g.

8. Physics without priests - modern Papuans. Talk to the Russian Federal Nuclear Center, g. Sarov // Thomas. Orthodox Journal for the doubters. Approved by the Publications Board of the Moscow Patriarchate. – 2003, №2(16) and New World. – 2004, №2.

9. Komlev, E.V. Antroposotsioyaderny phenomenon // The age of globalization. – 2011, №2. – С. 140-149.

10. Weinberg A. Social Institutions and Nuclear Energy. In: Science 177 (1972), S. 27-34.

11. Pugina, О.А. Material and spiritual nature of legal systems // Jurisprudence. – 2012, №1. – С. 18-23.

References

1. Jaspers, K. The atomic bomb and the Human Future: political awareness in our time. Munchen, 1958, 506 s.

2. Garrison, J. The Darkness of God: Theology after Hiroshima. London: SCM Press, 1982, 238 p.

3. Osipov, A.I. Audio-lekcii

(http://www.aosipov.ru / audio / audio_obshchii_spisok_lektsij.html).

4. Privetstvie Patriarkh Moskovskogo and vseya Russians Aleksiya II uchastnikam slushaniyj "Yadernihe vooruzheniya and nacionaljnaya bezopasnostj Rossii" (http://pravsarov.nne.ru/content/publication/461/552/486/518.html).

5. Kirjyanov, D.V. Nauka i religiya: manifold metodologicheskikh podkhodov // We try Toboljskoyj Dukhovnoyj seminarii, vihpusk 2. - Toboljsk: Toboljskaya Dukhovnaya seminariya, 2011. – S. 117-134.

6. Ethics and weapons of mass destruction: religious and secular perspectives / edited by S.H. Hashmi and S.P. Lee. – Cambridge, 2004. – 533 p.

7. Evidence Patriarkh Aleksiya II Yubileyjnom Arkhiereyjskom Sobor RPC, 2000g.

8. Physicists bez svyathennikov - sovremennihe papuasih. Word of the Assistant Rossiyjskogo federaljnogo yadernogo center, g. Sarov // Format. Pravoslavnihyj Zhurnal dlya somnevayuthikhsya. Approved Izdateljskim Sovetom MOSKOVSKOGO Patriarkhata. – 2003, №2(16) and Novihyj Peace. – 2004, №2.

9. Komleva, E.V. Antroposocioyadernihyj fenomen // Century globalizacii. – 2011, №2. – S. 140-149.

10. Weinberg A. Social Institutions and Nuclear Energy. In: Science 177 (1972), S. 27-34.

11. Pugina, O.A. Materialjnaya i dukhovnaya Nature pravovihkh system // Yuridicheskaya withered. – 2012, №1. – S. 18-23.

Received redaktsiyu24.10.12